|
|
|
|
@TL
Just a thought. My opinion only. Not the entire community: I do not really rant as that is not my nature, but if we cannot put a block on people putting inappropriate images on metafora.app so I do not see their stuff, and it does not interfere with my work, then why don't we put this app on time out until it is ready? I will come back quickly to it when there is a filter. If there are kids under the age of 18 viewing this stuff, it is not a good look. I also do not think this feature will take time to integrate either. Or let's put this as a work in progress and close it to the rest of the internet. Just for any MM holder with a certain amount of tokens can "beta" test this. I don't mind doing that. That is another option. Apologies for the rant, but I am not interested in looking at porn on this platform by malicious individuals. And obviously, these specific individuals are trying to hurt this brand that everyone has created and supported. And also while we beta test, we can offer featu
|
|
@NFTDailyNews lol, can't you see TL doesn't care about it. It didn't work as expected - he most likely wanted it to grow super fast, and it didn't. So he's looking for other ways to gain some profit - and for now, abandoned the project.
There were no updates for the last few weeks, though there is a hall to improve, not room. I don't think in the near future something's gonna happen except big deal of users will leave metafora, cause it's not that cool to see links to nft, dicks and "hello" messages.
|
|
|
@RomanistHere If he did not care, it would not be a smart business move for him and his brand to leave it up and let it ride with that type of spam. It would also get him into a bunch of legal troubles as being a negligent owner of the site. So if that was the case the excellent course of action would be for him to put the project offline temporally and tell folks that the updates are "in-process" and postponed until xyz timeframe. I am sure anyone who has worked on millions of websites would have done that.
Under 47 USC 230, I do not think he is responsible for what users put on the site. However, this is the internet. You have to consider jurisdiction and whether one took the best course of action to appropriately warn people or put certain measures in place to prohibit certain content. Cheers. Getting off from this topic.
|
| A project of Million Token. | FAQ |