@MM-Matt the current logo is a stock, free logo that TL chose to fill the space while developing the meat and bones of the product. We'll be seen as a joke if we have cheaply used that as opposed to something the community designed in what is supposed to be a decentralized, high-value token & project. It's not an option on the vote because it's not an option... and we don't want whale votes going to waste on a very bad branding decision.

@MM-Matt the concern was always branding and marketing-illiterate whales voting for something detrimental to the brand so those options were left off

@MM-Matt a free logo which anyone in the world can make and legally use in 2min is not good enough

@MM-Matt my second point is not a personal opinion. A stock image which is not trademarkable or original in the slightest for a "millionaire's" token and something TL wants to make big is not going to work. Imagine in a few years when there are a few logos looking exactly the same because everyone in the world is allowed to use it. It's an idiotic branding decision.

@0x5534fed98b46d5abbfa09e461ef00a41b3200f26 I'd do 40% MM and 15% each of AVAX, FTM, MATIC and MOVR.

@AaronMamuyac it'd be awesome if you would do a progress update on MM. Even our biggest Fudders have realized that we are quickly ticking things off of our roadmap and that the future is exciting for MM with it's multiple chains, it's growing ecosystem and the growing number of strong hands. Exchanges are not far off and a good base has been set with the bridges and when liquidity is no longer an issue - we are going to the moon.

@TL thanks for delivering once again!