@NFTDailyNews It's about reach, mate. Someone in the community has already done a fantastic job of trying this but didn't have the reach a 1m+ channel gets, sadly we cannot fight maths.
@NFTDailyNews We want people from the US to be incentivized too because higher disposable incomes generally yield higher net investments. In fact, it's an exponential function, a country twice as rich would be expected to have 5x the amount invested into the stock market, for example. An economics lesson for you :D
@JamesHuckle i was willing to give a youtube channel with 13k subscribers ...tey dont care too . So i sold my mm and invested somewhere where i can be listen
@NFTDailyNews Other than that I am not the type to hold my breath. If you want to build there is honestly nothing stopping anyone. Just have to make sure people in the community can trust you. From what I see in the past, there have been some questionable characters. 🤷♂️ But yes going back to James directions/clarity is a good thing too.
@MONSTERDRINK thank you.
MonsterDrink can you bring that Youtube channel back and start making videos? 13k subs is a lot in terms of big opportunity cost. Also whoever has those big Twitter accounts would be helpful too.
Maybe TL feels comfortable doing the development solo. For example, Elon Musk wrote Paypal by himself. His coders were not good.
But like Paypal we can integrate this token in so many ways. Maybe TL just wants to build the base layer/bridge and people just figure it out from there? For example mankind shaped this planet for their use with the natural resources provided.
I would still argue that you guys do not need TL to build projects on MM. And there is no problem asking for donations on the socials. Many content creators still accept donations with wallet addresses to fund their activities.
Few concerns I can think of when building on MM is to make sure the community trust you and code/service has been audited.
Else I sense TL will reads this and directions should be fort
If there was some clever way, or if we wanted to trust someone to actively manage the money supply to peg it to something, the rules could have been programmed for that.
Hi guys. I see the crap that a certain individual is posting on here that is not fit for kids. And his/her intention now falls in the category of malice as he/she has been warned several times in the past. @TL that blocking feature would be nice where if I block someone, I do not want to ever see that content. In the time being if you guys do not agree with this individual, do not respond to their post. Instead, create a separate thread like this one. That way their content does not move above the rank.
